I agree with the display lag problem - it's disconcerting for the display t= o freeze while the USB channel is trying to re-fill the buffer when I change = a setting. The USB control panel is an interesting idea but would require that you hav= e a spot for the control panel on your bench. I like that I bring the scope to the circuit and not the other way around. An iPad app with a wireless connection to the device might be interesting, Imagine if you could use the 2-finger separate (like enlarging pictures/web pages) to change your vertical or horizontal resolution. If we ever get desktop touch screens then that could change everything. DougM On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Herbert Graf wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 17:22 -0700, YES NOPE9 wrote: > > Would a USB scope be useful to you if it had a USB connected control > panel ? > > ( with knobs and stuff ) > > gus in denver 99gus > > It would be better, but then you're going up in cost and approaching > basic standalone units. > > You'd still most likely have the issue of display lag. > > It all depends on how you use a scope, for many the USB scope idea is > fantastic, I only pull mine out when I have no other option. > > TTYL > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .