Seems like you should be able to go down to the local technical school and talk to the instructor about borrowing some time on a scope - they're not that rare. Or any local firm that does electronics work - they'll have several and I would hope the techs there would be happy to help out. DougM On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Sean Breheny wrote: > Nobody is suggesting that he not eventually try making his own scope. > However, it is foolish to think that one is going to lash up a scope > in a few days, with no budget and no additional scope to debug the > design. I tried doing this back when I was 18 years old and while I > did learn some things, it took me months and I did not succeed, mainly > because I lacked a scope to check my design. > > Sean > > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:28 AM, doug metzler > wrote: > > I think you should go for it. I'm excited to see a design that has a > > wireless link to the computer. > > > > When I got my first USB scope it was less than a week before I was > convinced > > that standalone scopes were a thing of the past - at least for the kind > of > > work I do. > > > > So your first design might have some limitations, but that's what > revisions > > are for. > > > > DougM > > > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:46 PM, RussellMc wrote: > > > >> > >>> It's going to be a very simple, low speed oscilloscope. > >> > >> > >> There should be something of this kind for Android-based devices, > >> > >> probably in the near future. Your data will be saved automaticall= y > as > >> > >> Google docs. > >> > >> > > That's depressing. > >> > >> > Why? That ARM based devices have, if I am not mistaken, ADCs and GPI= Os > >> > ... I'd rather say it's impressing, not depressing. > >> > >> You may get a better feel for the image that came to mind that caused > >> him to write that if you Gargafraffle various mixes of > >> > >> Don't be evil. > >> To own all the world's data (aka store) > >> 1984 > >> George Orwell. > >> Waddya mean the network was down, how can the... > >> Standalone/ Self contained / > >> One may also, just possibly, invoke shadows of Godwin. > >> > >> ... > >> > >> I imagine that he also finds it modestly impressive at a technical > level. > >> > >> Whatever. > >> > >> Russell > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .