-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 18/02/11 22:33, Herbert Graf wrote:
> Frankly, if it samples at 1Msps then I wouldn't expect to use it for
> anything more then 50-100kHz. Anything more and you can easily start
> mistaking what's actually happening.
>=20
> A good benchmark is the Tektronix baby scope we have in the lab samples
> at 1Gsps, but specifies a bandwidth of 60MHz.
>=20
> Still, if all you're doing is audio or a little above that it should
> work well.
>=20
> TTYL
>=20

Yes you are correct; naturally, a real world signal will be
unintelligable when it is anywhere near the Nyquist frequency. I
probably shouldn't have mentioned 500KHz at all!

Still, 1Msps is an improvement over the OP's 200Ksps.

Brendan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1e+7gACgkQHEhZ5Ws5poH9sACgyc8j3Pd7fIAHuRLV/Q9b66yO
BgIAn02ZqqIpqhfK17s1dGzcWVs+bJXk
=3DJkKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.