On 15/02/2011 16:38, Yigit Turgut wrote:
>> There's the real problem.  Try physics instead of faith if you want to d=
o
>> >  real engineering.
> He is the one (guy who invented) who already did the engineering part
> eventhough without control, I am trying to build a reasonable
> theoretical model for this VERY REAL WORLD EXAMPLE. Which means THERE
> EXISTS such a system and beside that I am telling that I drove it.
> Which part of your 3-piece techo-brain doesn't get the scheme ?

I don't get the "scheme" either, as there does not seem to be any=20
"scheme" to get..
I generally try to keep an open mind, not get too cynical etc, (prior to=20
a proper scientific investigation) but from the outside I'm afraid this=20
looks like utter nonsense. I would love to be proven wrong though. If=20
this is a "very real world example", then to gather some *real* data,=20
post a video or pictures should be no problem (unless it's top secret of=20
course, but it's unlikely you would be discussing it here if that was=20
the case)
If it's simply something you are trying to understand, then with the=20
requested information I'm sure most folk will be happy to help. If it's=20
something else, well...




--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.