There are some links at my second post on this topic. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Olin Lathrop w= rote: > The part that has weighed the evidence and concluded that at best you are= a > gullable person not so good with physics, or a outright liar at worst. So you assumed the road is linear ? What kind of a perception is that (((: have you heard the word "helical" ? Don't think with the part of your brain that has weighed the evidence and concluded that at best I am a gullable person not so good with physics, or a outright liar at worst, because that part obviously rotted decades ago ((: You have issues and everyone knows about them don't pretend like you don't. If there is a time to open yourself it's now, we are your friends, we can help you get through this but you have to admit it first ((: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Yigit Turgut wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Olin Lathrop = wrote: > Yigit Turgut wrote: > I was hoping this [OT] tag wouldn't get specifically to your inbox but > it did ((: Please don't respond to any of my posts and keep on playing > trampOline with your pic's I don't want you to even read my posts ((: Look it's easy it's just a pattern recognition process. Don't is the negative sign reading is the operator and my posts is the data all you have to do is to read and it will automatically be encoded from your rones and cones as an electrical signal to your occipital lobe and the rest will be very quick, it won't hurt, we all do it. --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .