Yigit Turgut wrote:
> He said his vehicle has  500km driving range with 4 standart car
> accumulators (12V) connected in serial as power source.
>
> ...
>
> Before saying anything he wanted me to test his vehicle. He started
> the engine ...

So it's not running totally from 4 car batteries.

> For a yettosecond I considered if there could exist  any possibility
> that -this guy- exploited some undiscovered or forgotten phenomenon in
> nature

Very very very unlikely.  The basic physics of conservation of energy has
been well trodden.  It takes energy to move the car.  That energy has to
come from somehwere.  From your description, too much energy was used so
that it couldn't have come from 4 car batteries alone.  The obvious answer
is additional energy came from somewhere else.  This "engine" thing sounds
like a good suspect.

> (I have tendency to believe)

There's the real problem.  Try physics instead of faith if you want to do
real engineering.

> What I can tell from my observations is  that
> motion is not created turning the wheels by exerting force on them -
> like current cars in market

You've now completely impeached what little credibility you might have had.
Reading anything else you wrote is therefore pointless.  I can't tell if
you're a deliberate fraud or just a gullable person that didn't pay
attention in physics class.  Either way, you're now just a waste of time.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.