Em 14/2/2011 23:46, Oli Glaser escreveu:
> On 15/02/2011 00:27, Yigit Turgut wrote:
>> I know that this simply violates conservation of energy thus I wanted
>> to share with you so if one can spot the missing piece and explain how
>> come this is possible.
>>
> Sorry, none of that makes much sense without some proper information=20
> i.e. numbers/workings, diagrams, video etc.
> For instance - what type/rating are the batteries? How do you *know*=20
> that more than 40% of them should have been used during the testing?=20
> Were you actually monitoring power draw/levels during testing?
> How do you come to the conclusion that "efficiency is greater than 1"?
> If motion is not produced by the wheels turning, where do you think it=20
> is coming from? How *exactly* does it differ from any other car? You say=
=20
> "even before doing any calculations.." - did you actually do any?
> I'm sure there is a reasonably simple explanation for whatever you think=
=20
> is "missing", but you need to take a methodical, scientific approach to=20
> working it out (or provide enough reliable data for others to do so)


This guy seems to be just trolling around, like those fake testimonials
about the quality of special audiophile power cords.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.