I'm no expert in this area, but have got into the topic a bit. I thought that basically one ground rod, and on a single phase system,=20 the neutral is also grounded there for all loads supplied by that=20 supply. This minimizes ground loops. Then important not to tie together=20 anywhere else the neutral and ground. That also might create weird=20 issues with GFCI's. I assume the 3 phase is for heavy motors, etc., and=20 a normal 110/220 single phase is derived from that. Could you not then=20 treat the 110/220 single phase in the normal manner, providing surge=20 suppressor at main breaker box. For the whole house, I have had one of=20 these for maybe 5 years, and we are in an open area with lightning. http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=3Dwhole+house+surge+suppression&oe= =3Dutf-8&rls=3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official&client=3Dfirefox-a&um=3D1&ie=3DUT= F-8&cid=3D2095718605650227831&ei=3Dc_JXTe2YHMKftgfZ2YXsDA&sa=3DX&oi=3Dprodu= ct_catalog_result&ct=3Dimage&resnum=3D1&ved=3D0CCsQ8gIwAA# This one mounts next to breaker box, connects to 2 existing breakers. Here's a 3 phase: http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/SQUARE-D-Surge-Arrestor-3-Phase-600vac-3XB= 87 And here's a bunch of them: http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/ecatalog/N-/No-80/Ntt-surge+suppressor On 2/13/2011 9:35 AM, Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > Hello, > > We get our share of thunderstorms and lightnings around here, and I'd > like to protect the electric supply of our home -- somewhere near the > entry. The > > The supply is a three-phase system with a neutral wire (four wires) and > the neutral wire is grounded (typically a grounding rod) at each > connection point. > > Our connection point is at the property boundary, where the four wires > come in from the street. As required, the neutral is grounded there and > there is a master circuit breaker. This would be the first possibility > to place overvoltage protectors, between the three phases and the ground > rod (which is connected to the neutral). > > My question with this is whether this makes sense, considering that the > neutral is connected to the same ground rod where I'd connect the > protection devices -- and the neutral comes from the same "problem zone" > where the 3 phases come from. But OTOH it's supposedly well grounded and > probably already reasonably clean when it reaches my property. (I don't > expect to have good protection if a lightning strikes within a few > meters... :) > > > From there, the four wires go through some 20 m underground to reach th= e > house. There I have a ground rod for the protective earth wire in the > installation inside the house (separate neutral and PE). This would be > another place to put the protection devices (and I've seen quite a few > installations that do this). > > However, I don't think I'd like to connect the protection devices to the > protective earth grounding rod; after all, it's directly connected to > many exposed surfaces all over the house. Connecting them to the neutral > there would beg the same question as in the first option, with few if > any advantages. (If a lightning strikes directly on the property, I > don't think there's much that these protection devices can do anyway.) > > It's not easily possible to use a third ground rod that is far enough > away from the other two. I'm tending to prefer the first option, placing > the protective devices right at the entry point, and connect them to the > neutral/ground connection there. > > Does anybody have any ideas what is the best solution here? What do you > guys do for lightning protection? > > > BTW, how would this earthing scheme be called? It seems it is a mixture > between TN-C-S and TT. AIUI, it would be TN-C-S if I hadn't used a > separate ground rod for PE and connected PE to the same ground rod where > the incoming neutral is connected to, and it would be TT if the incoming > neutral weren't grounded at each connection to the grid. > > The overvoltage protectors they sell for TN-S and TT systems have four > protection devices, and the ones they sell for TN-C systems have three. > Another question I have is how many overvoltage protection devices I > need. I figure I only need three... no use trying to protect the > combined neutral/PE wire that comes from the pole, since it is grounded > anyway. Right? > > Thanks, > Gerhard > =20 --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .