On 07/02/2011 00:26, Nathan House wrote:
> First schematic:
> http://www.roboticsguy.com/images/misc/balancing_robot/balancing-robot-bo=
ard-schematic-r8.png
> New schematic:http://www.roboticsguy.com/images/misc/balancing_robot/bala=
ncing-robot-board-schematic-r9.png
>
> Is that better?

Both look fine - I wouldn't worry too much about what random, extreme=20
obsessions with neatness etc, people may have as long as it's=20
"sensible", and legible to the majority.
While this stuff matters to some extent, most will not write you off=20
simply because you failed turn a designator round 90 degrees, and if=20
they do, you're probably better off not working for/with them anyway.
One thing - IMHO there's no harm in making the names more descriptive,=20
e.g. +5V and Vmotor for the two supplies (then you don't need the=20
explanatory text) With more complex designs which may have many=20
nets/pages this can make things easier.



--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.