On 06/02/2011 13:58, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> Oli Glaser wrote:
>> More that they took a free compiler, removed (most of) the
>> optimisations
> That doesn't make sense.  I expect that the extra optimizations are the o=
nes
> that are specific to their chip, and therefore didn't exist in the compil=
er
> they started with.
>

Possibly, though I got the impression from the small amount I have read=20
they were there to start with.
Why wouldn't it make sense if they wish to encourage folk to buy their=20
version?





--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.