On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Oli Glaser <oli.glaser@talktalk.net> wrote:

> On 06/02/2011 07:25, V G wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > does anyone know the key differences between the Microchip C32 LITE
> version
> > and normal version?
>
> AFAIK it is just the -o2 and -o3 optimisations are turned off for the
> lite version. So, if this is the case, then not much really for a lot of
> stuff - you just may use a bit more code space/cycles (both of which you
> have a lot of compared to the lower end PICs anyway) What exactly the
> optimisations do will be documented somewhere if you want to know
> exactly the differences.
>
> Interesting thread here - would need to look more closely, but it seems
> the whole thing is based on GNU open source, so MC may be rather out of
> order for charging ~=A3800 for not much more than repackaging and
> distributing it...
>
> http://www.eevblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=3D2393.0
>
> Another (more relevant to the question) here:
>
> http://www.microchip.com/forums/m504906.asp<http://www.microchip.com/foru=
ms/m504906.aspx>


That's perfect. I don't know why they just don't make an "Arduino" for the
PIC32. You have a free compiler and a free IDE. For some reason, I just
can't stand the AVR.

Luckily, there's the UBW32.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.