> Suitable for EE

Note that being asked to move a discussion to [OT] is NOT to cast
aspersions on the poster or the posted material. It's simply a
procedural matter.

You can usually tell when bob is trying to make pointed comment on the
merits of a post :-).

________________

I sympathise with the EE/OT uncertainty.

The/a problem is that while the idea of a product being able to shield
or not sgield a user has an EE basis, the overwhelming bent of such
things is their quackery, and the result is that the discussion
rapidly changes to types of quackery, determining quackery, defining
quackery, profiting from ... . ie the EE content is almost invariably
rapidly lost.

The idea of EE is to provide a good honest hands apple pie and
motherhood  on electronics you can build yourself arena. this is to
provide a suitable buffer for the holy* [PIC] subject so that the
purists can bask there in untroubled bliss.

While some (and I) may not mind too too much about the wandering of
some quackery discussion into EE it does mean that before long you
have to herd a madding throng out into OT.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.