On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:01 -0700, YES NOPE9 wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 1:22 PM, YES NOPE9 wrote:
>=20
> I want it to be low power, easy to determine what devices are linked and =
hard to eavesdrop.  Intel light peak technology does not meet many of my re=
quirements.

Depends how you define "hard to eavesdrop". It's still RF in nature,
even though a "normal" devices range is only 10-30cm, it isn't too
difficult to build something that can hear the signal from MUCH farther
away, especially considering the frequencies involved.

People thought Bluetooth would be safer for the same reason, then people
built antennas and hardware and were sniffing Bluetooth traffic from
hundreds of meters away.

TTYL

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.