On 13/01/2011 16:29, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> V G wrote:
>> >  I don't want to waste time learning it when there's
>> >  other software that's far easier to learn
> Then you'll be cursed to use software that is optimized for first
> impressions instead of useful depth and lasting utility.
>

Hang on, I'm puzzled as to exactly what you are saying here - if a piece=20
of software makes a good first impression is that a bad thing? Is it a=20
"curse" to take the approach of using software that does?
I understand the need to look a "bit deeper" and give e.g. complex=20
software more than a cursory glance before deciding it's rubbish, and if=20
that is what you meant I agree (i.e. not giving less "optimised for=20
first impression" software a chance), but I think the above could easily=20
confuse.

> Your choice of course, but please don't whine about it here either way.
>

Is whining about (someone) whining okay?   :-)




--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.