Oli Glaser wrote:
> It does say "on a single chip" though. To have done it on one of those >
> 30M gate multi-FPGA boards would be "easy" and far less impressive I gues=
s.
> I think the cores they are not your typical soft cores we are used to,
> probably designed/specialised to work together at the task in hand,
> share resources etc (probably a bit like the cores on GPUs as N.T notes)
> Maybe they are stretching the definition of the word "core" (e.g. does
> it have a "full" instruction set? can it perform "standard" core tasks? e=
tc)
> It would be nice to know more (sure we will soon),

They are investing hundreds of millions in the idea (concept), and I'm
sure they know what they are doing.  Good ideas are not always cheap.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.