On 05/01/11 13:20, Oli Glaser wrote:

[re TI CDCE925 clock gen]

> Good choice, I should/would have mentioned something like that if I
> wasn't so rushed at the moment - I am using a CDCE706 on my PIC18/FPGA
> board I mentioned before - works very nicely indeed.

Always nice to know the 'sister chip' works nicely. Hopefully its big=20
brother will work just as well :)

I did find it curious that the list price on the 925 is less than the=20
913 (the same chip with fewer PLLs and dividers)... Hm. Not that I'm=20
grumbling of course! :)

> NI make some really good timing ICs too - I just got some samples from
> them for my scope proto board, very impressive specs but (for the ones I
> got) expensive too. I know they do some similar (cheaper) ones too
> though that are worth checking out for varying demands/prices
> (speed/delay/no of outputs/CMOS/LVDS etc)

NI as in National Instruments? The GPIB guys?

Or do you mean National Semiconductor (NSC)?

--=20
Phil.
piclist@philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.