It sounds like I walked into a bigger issue than I was aware of! All I=20
know is I saw my own post wrapped...

And I appreciate the accolades!


Joe K



On 11/22/2010 4:26 AM, RussellMc wrote:
>>   On 22/11/2010 01:05, James Newton wrote:
>>> This has my nomination for best post to the piclist in years.
>>> I would (if I were an admin, and I am not) ask Joe to become an admin a=
nd
>>> pass on his offer to MIT.
>>>
>>> But since I have no weight (or should not) on this list, let me just sa=
y:
>>> "Nice job Joe"
> I second the "nice job" accolade.
>
>   I'd see that assessment as rather biased :-) - BUT I'd agree that the
> suggestion has great merit. Whether the accompanying meritorious offer
> is acceptable to MIT would need TBD.
>
> I've flagged the recommendation to Admins - Jory especially as it's
> likely his voice has a few orders of magnitude more weight in such
> things.
>
> Fixing the email problem would if nothing else lay to rest the ongoing
> "my broken hand crafted email client does things better than their
> broken email server/ client / other  and more people should break
> things the same way I do " / "hard terminated lines are so passe" / "
> Standards ! Standards!" /  " ..." and,
> who knows,
> maybe when I reply to text that others send as plain text but which
> now arrives in my GMailInBox as "rich formatted", I will no longer
> have to change it back to genuinely plain text to stop being (gently)
> abused, as at present,  for other people's broken clients being unable
> to scan it correctly.
>
> One can hope :-)
>
>
>          Russell
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.