Is house testimony subject to a process more effective than peer review=20 for discovering error? On 11/19/2010 2:17 PM, Sean Breheny wrote: > Hi Joe, > > You make a good point about considering the others there who seem to > be in the majority. I don't know how long you have been on the list > but Russell has really done his homework on this subject and I am > fairly sure that he has read the IPCC reports at least, if not > material from some of these other individuals. > > Also, I have done (and continue to do) peer reviews for IEEE > publications, due to having published there in grad school. Based on > what I've seen, I don't put all that much stock in the ability of peer > review to catch errors other than ones which are pretty sloppy. > > Sean > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Koberg wrote: >> There were 11 other panelists at the hearing. Perhaps we should >> consider all of their testimony. >> --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .