Hi Joe, You make a good point about considering the others there who seem to be in the majority. I don't know how long you have been on the list but Russell has really done his homework on this subject and I am fairly sure that he has read the IPCC reports at least, if not material from some of these other individuals. Also, I have done (and continue to do) peer reviews for IEEE publications, due to having published there in grad school. Based on what I've seen, I don't put all that much stock in the ability of peer review to catch errors other than ones which are pretty sloppy. Sean On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Koberg wrote: > There were 11 other panelists at the hearing. =A0Perhaps we should > consider all of their testimony. > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .