On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:

> the "hotel loads" shouldn't be able to take out the drive of the ship.

Did they?  I thought it was the other way around; they lost the main =20
engines, and the "hotel loads" died too...

It would be interesting to read an engineering-oriented post-incident =20
report.

BillW

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.