If we need a good reliable library best we evaluate the code itself.
Trusting the app notes is not a wise thing to do. I do recall
some of the app notes in Microchip are quite bad. Off my head was the EEPRO=
M code itself...... I am now looking into AVR RC calibration app notes*AVR0=
53*. So far looks decent......=20

John







--- On Tue, 11/9/10, Olin Lathrop <olin_piclist@embedinc.com> wrote:

> From: Olin Lathrop <olin_piclist@embedinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [PIC] Microchip HID bootloader bug fixes
> To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 5:27 PM
> 'William Chops" Westfield ' <westfw@mac.com
> wrote:
> > Or maybe the good programmers get tired
> > of rewriting the same-old hacks for each new chip...
>=20
> Or the good programmers want to do real projects instead of
> writing
> artificial app notes, and can make a lot more money at it
> too.
>=20
> Either way I think you're right.=A0 App notes are
> written by those who nobody
> wants writing their real app.
>=20
>=20
> ********************************************************************
> Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
> (978) 742-9014.=A0 Gold level PIC consultants since
> 2000.
> --=20
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>=20


     =20

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.