Vitaliy wrote:
> I agree with this in general, however the economics of the situation
> are against it. Only about 4% of visitors still use IE6, and it would
> cost more to make the site compatible with IE6 than it took to
> develop it originally.

I wasn't aware of this, but also don't understand why it's so.  If only 4%
use IE6 and it would require special development, then I agree you should
ignore it.  But IE6 does work on basic features, so this means you are
trying to use something more advanced.  Do you really need it, or is it
fluff?  Remember that when web designers think it's cool, that means it's
annoying to users.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.