On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tamas Rudnai wrot= e: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:04 AM, William "Chops" Westfield > wrote: > >> > But hopefully not as painfully slowly as other Java based IDEs I >> > have abandoned using... >> >> Eh. =A0Buy a faster computer. =A0It's small change, these days. >> > > I have fairly new stuff here, and still can feel that is slower than a > native app. However, what I concern is not the GUI where a click or typin= g > is much slower than anything else. In fact I like how the new IDE looks l= ike > and what features it brings in terms of helping the developer to overview > his/her projects. I worry about, however, the compiler and simulator. If > they are not native apps then we (PIC developers / IDE users) may suffer = in > productivity. I really like how fast is the MPSIM (the old, native code > based one) and would be said if it was slow down. The only problem is tha= t > the simulator is not yet available for testing so in the meantime just > waiting to see more. No need to worry. The compilers are still the existing native compiler. What on earth would they want to develop a Java based compiler to replace the existing GCC based C30/C32? --=20 Xiaofan --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .