"wump" or something along those lines, IIRC?

I don't think it was a programmer people were really interested in
owning, so much as they were interested in describing.

In other communities where a successful product was formed it appears
to be due to one person taking the lead and doing it.  We had one
person who indicated they were going to go ahead and do it, and I
think they even started a new mailing list for eveyone interested, but
I don't know what the outcome was.

It's a fun way to shoot the breeze though.

-Adam

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> wrote:
>> If we pulled together, we'd be dangerous.
>
> I don't think so. I remember years ago when the list tried to specify
> the ideal PIC development board (or was it a programmer?). I don't
> recall exactly how many different design directions surfaced, but the
> list membership count was probably a good approximation.
>
> If the piclist designed skyscrapers we would all be living 10 stories
> below ground. And still be arguing about the interior design.
>
> --
>
> Wouter van Ooijen
>
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.