On 25/09/2010 02:03, RussellMc wrote:
>> I'm very very busy with work
> And I certainly should be.
>
>> ... and have no time ...
> uphill, both ways, in the snow, no shoes, bottom of a lake, cardboard box=
 ... .
> Yes. Absolutely. I resemble that.
>
>> to address your equating "so
>> do mise" with "hurtful words" etc, but I wanted to very quickly comment =
on
>> this:
> 1. I had to go back and read what I'd said to make sense of that :-).
> [[spacings were an attempt to keep it away from the search engines -
> we can do without their excess attentions on such largely unrelated
> matters. ]].
> That sort of thing really really really should be quoted in full
> context if at all as it has the potential to be misunderstood beyond
> all reasonableness. The context was that as an EXTREME real world
> example, a person who had been put through extreme physical
> circumstances had their whole response to subsequent situations is
> life affected in ways which would make no sense at all to people who
> were unaware of their background but would  make lots of  sense to
> those who were. I was suggesting that while such things are linear,
> past history and environment and unavoidable genetics shape people's
> subsequent responses to life in ways in which they have incomplete
> control over. Or, as I summarised it, subtle is the mind. I am not
> wishing to make PC excuses for people's behaviours - only to note that
> there is much that shapes human lives that all concerned and
> unconcerned are often unaware of.
>
> 2.
>   >  Please do a quick search,
>> I believe it should not take you more than 5 minutes to find the relevan=
t
>> messages.
> Your faith in my abilities is flattering - but in this context and
> order of magnitude is still too small.
>
>> If you are serious about discussing its merits, please start a new
>> thread.
> You can (hopefully) do better than that.
> I just had a long and unpleasant wade through all sorts of stuff - the
> better part of an hour !!! :-( -  I'd rather not have had to revisit,
> some of the lighter moments involving adumbrations of fascism and
> someone (possibly Vitaliy :-) ) walking home with a paid bus ticket
> :-).
>
> I found a number of places where you refer to what you've said before,
> (the exact same thing you are referring to now). I found a post 6
> months + 1 day ago where I asked you to state clearly what you were
> talking about so we could examine it again, but you seem to have
> declined to do so then as now.
>
> If you think your prior offerings have current merit then please
> repost them, modified or as was. Without specific reference there have
> been so many posts under so many headings that asking anyone else to
> find which one you are referring to needs to be a paying job :-)
> (which I wouldn't want to take).
>
> It does seem that I compassed  my likely response locus "extremely
> well" 6 or so months ago. I doubt that anyone really wants me to do
> that again :-).
>
>
>          Russell
it 2.25am here
but I suspect later in the day this make no sense either. maybe needs to=20
be off list? Don't listen to me I should be in bed 3 hrs ago
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.