> That is just sheer nonsense. I dare anyone to come up with the most hurtf=
ul
> language they can muster, call me the worst names they know, and I would
> gladly take that abuse over the pain of a papercut.

I'd be willing to bet you a peppercorn (higher stakes than I'm usually
wont to wager) that I could do that with relative ease. I don't wish
or intend to even provide examples with any content. You didn't say
that it had to be true. Given that, a subtle mix of say family,
business, ethics, morals, patriotism, racism and a bit more, posted
with suitable terms to ensure it was picked up by major search engines
and maybe sent to a few selected websites would have you uncertain
whether to 1st reach for your shotgun,  ring your lawyer or start to
work out how to raise a Posse Comitatus in NZ.
What say I add a :-) on the end of that.
 On reflection I'd hope that you'd agree that that was true. That is
of course a very extreme case to make a point, and even much less
would suffice. My point is that we almost all have a point at which we
get pushed over the edge. It varies widely and as you indicate that
you are thick skinned and uncaring about such things, you probably
can't do a really good job of putting yourself in sensitive people's
shoes.


   Russell
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.