RussellMc wrote:
>> It's not just the "management". A few years back his fellow members vote=
d
>> 2:1 to maintain the status quo.
>
> That's actually highly untrue - but I'm not blaming anyone for
> thinking it is true. I observed what was and wasn't done at the time
> and what questions were put and why. For various reasons I have
> slightly more insight into what happened overall.
>
> If anyone is interested and wants to authoritatively quote chapter and
> verse they would need to at least review all the related material. I
> don't imagine that there is in fact much point in rehashing what did
> or didn't happen then as opposed to doing whatever seems appropriate
> now - but if interested in referring to past events it may be useful
> to be aware of the above comments.
>
> If anyone is REALLY interested and is willing to sign an NDA in the
> blood of their firstborn I MAY be willing to comment offlist. But,
> maybe not, and it's not worth asking move along nothing to see here
> these are not the ones you want.

Russell, prove it.

You publicly call me a liar (for all intents and purposes), but offer no=20
proof whatsoever. The email dated 2008/06/09 (of which you are also a=20
recipient) is hardly ambiguous. I'm not going to sign any NDAs (my word=20
should be good enough), but I will gladly listen to your arguments off-line=
=20
and offer a public retraction of my comments if the preponderance of=20
evidence warrants it.

I'm not saying I agree with the majority, or that I am satisfied with the=20
process or the outcome. I simply stated the fact that the majority of those=
=20
who answered the question of whether Olin should be moderated, voted in his=
=20
favor.

Vitaliy

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.