> It's not just the "management". A few years back his fellow members voted
> 2:1 to maintain the status quo.

That's actually highly untrue - but I'm not blaming anyone for
thinking it is true. I observed what was and wasn't done at the time
and what questions were put and why. For various reasons I have
slightly more insight into what happened overall.

If anyone is interested and wants to authoritatively quote chapter and
verse they would need to at least review all the related material. I
don't imagine that there is in fact much point in rehashing what did
or didn't happen then as opposed to doing whatever seems appropriate
now - but if interested in referring to past events it may be useful
to be aware of the above comments.

If anyone is REALLY interested and is willing to sign an NDA in the
blood of their firstborn I MAY be willing to comment offlist. But,
maybe not, and it's not worth asking move along nothing to see here
these are not the ones you want.


           Russell
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.