Rolf wrote:
> This tells me that, to prepare his response to my mail, he looked at
> the front page.

I followed your link from your original message to see what was there.  As =
I
said, I was going to silently leave it that until your second message
seeking more attention.

> Yup, he did not click on a single link.  You know the
> links
> to the "PIC", "PIC EE and TECH", and "PIC OT and everything else"
> links, well, he did not click a single one of them.

Like I said, it didn't look like anything useful to me.  I could be wrong o=
f
course, but I think I've got a pretty good idea what's behind the PIC, TECH=
,
OT, and related links.

> I am just surprised that he went to so much effort *before* he told
> me I was delusional.

As you pointed out, it was really no effort at all, and it was before I kne=
w
you sent the second message.

> And, what's more, he has the nerve to say the archive is
> not really worth doing anything about "it's not nice enough to get off
> my butt and help", yet, he is quick to get off his butt, at 5:21am to
> try piss someone off...

If you don't want a response, don't send a second message complaning how th=
e
first message didn't didn't get any responses.

Also look up something called "time zones".  It certainly wasn't 5:21 here.

> and to then have the gaul to say that James's
> 'Sincerity is suspect' just irks me.

Oh well.  Does it not seem odd to you that he doesn't follow up on a
potential source of revenue for his site, while at the same time soliciting
for donations?


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.