> A lot of other people have commented further on this, but what it
> comes down to is this: Yes, one of the end users will be nuclear power
> stations. This product is nowhere near the "nuclear" part of the
> facility, but all the same red tape applies. We can produce a
> microprocessor version, there is a path to getting the software
> accepted, the process is so onerous that it makes the project an
> economical non-starter.

ROFL! So up to today no red-taper has the idea to extend the rules for=20
software to extend programmable logic?

--=20

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.