On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:20:54 +1200, "RussellMc" said:

>=20
>               http://www.imagesco.com/psi/esp.html
>=20
> Note that they are driven by nuclear decay, allowing ESPers the easier
> task of nuclear decay manipulation. compared to the altering of
> parameters in deterministic software based pseudo random generators.
> (Achieving similar results by ESP inducing protection diode leakage
> currents is not considered fair game).
>=20
> Shielding between the Paradigm Shift Awareness detector and ESPer or
> PSA and/or the random decay unit may be a good idea. It's not certain
> that mu-metal is adequate for this task.

Extensive testing at my lab has shown that it is very hard to measure
paradigm shifts without also influencing them. Anyone who has done RF
work or used an oscilloscope extensively knows how hard some things are
to measure!

Cheerful regards,

Bob

--=20
http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.