Charles Rogers wrote:
>> You'd have to run the PIC from a **very** slow clock to get timer 2
>> down to
>> that period.  Then you'd have to wait a few weeks to verify it's
>> working.
>
> Olin:
> Are you saying it is  possible to accomplish what the OP is looking
> for but just isn't feasible.

My comment makes little sense without the snippet of the OP's post I was
replying to and that I quoted.  Yes, I think it would be unrealistic to mak=
e
timer 2 produce a 2Ms period (I think that was the OP's value) on its own.
This can easily be done in firmware, however.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.