I think I understand. In the TV game "Jeopardy" they phrase an answer in
the form of a question. In this case, you were asking a question, but
had it phrased in the form of a challenge?

At some later date I would be happy to talk about it, perhaps when your
post from yesterday is not fresh in my memory.

Best regards,

Bob



On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:42:56 -0700, "Vitaliy" said:
> Bob Blick wrote:
> >> > Well, this sounds a lot like economics and I'm not treading any farther
> >> > into this territory since it is not an allowed topic.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I cannot let this go unchallenged.
> >>
> >> If it really is forbidden, then why is this fact not spelled out in the
> >> rules, along with religion and politics? AFAICT economics is a topic that
> >> you *personally* have a problem with, but there is no general agreement
> >> that
> >> it should not be allowed.
> >
> > No, you are wrong on all counts.
> 
> Care to explain, and maybe define what you mean by "economics"? You
> allowed 
> yourself to use the economic principle of supply and demand in this very 
> thread.
> 
> I honestly don't understand what you find so objectionable about
> economics. 
> It is a science, no less so than physics or psychology (albeit perhaps
> more 
> often misunderstood).
> 
> Vitaliy 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist