I have a suspicion that Andrew Wood has long gone. Andrew, are you still receiving. Over. On 24 May 2010 19:18, Michael Watterson wrote: > sergio masci wrote: > > On Mon, 24 May 2010, Russell McMahon wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmm, now there's a thought! Build a small unit that looks after N lines > > and talks to the PC via USB. If you can get N down to 45, build two > > identical units with different USB addresses, get them to look after > their > > own block of lines and let the PC sort out the rest. You could even > reduce > > N to a much (DIP PIC) friendlier number and use more units. I don't know > > much about USB, how easy would it be to have several PICs sharing one USB > > socket? Of course all this is assuming that the project is just a one > off. > > > > Anyway I still prefer the "wide" shift register solution. > > > > Regards > > Sergio Masci > > > Bad idea. You have multiple USB devices. > To use same socket you need a hub. More expense. > It's trivial to have say HW TTL USART between the PICs and one with USB. > but one PIC with shift registers or switches or buffers is best unless a > space issue. > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist