Michael Watterson wrote:
> Olin Lathrop wrote:
>>   The dsPIC sampled sampled the analog signals at
>> 100KHz and the manchester data rate was 10KHz.  The firmware data
>> slicer was faster and performed better than the all analog data
>> slicer in the previous model.
>
> yes,
>
> but you still need to use correct clock rate at TX and Manchester
> encoding and Manchester encoding is probably  still best  solution.

I'm not sure why you say "but", since I never mentioned anything other than
manchester encoding.  There are other ways to send data over RF, and some
give you higher data rate at the same bandwidth, but manchester is the easy
and simple way and works very well.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist