Russell McMahon wrote:
> It doesn't seem to all be equally searchable - so maybe the text
> capture was done manually? !

I doubt it. The text is easily readable and a good OCR program would have no 
trouble with it. I would guess that Google purchases these articles already 
in digital format, instead of scanning the microfilm.

When I scan documents at work (e.g., signed copies) I let Acrobat OCR them 
as well. It doesn't take long and sometimes being able to search within the 
document comes in handy.

Vitaliy 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist