On Saturday, April 3, 2010, Tamas Rudnai <tamas.rudnai@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:24 PM, solarwind <x.solarwind.x@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Obviously I don't want other people messing with It
>> so I would use encryption...
>>
>
> Encryption is for privacy, not for messing up with others. If you do not
> want to mess with others, then learn how to build radio step by step and
> keep all existing regulations and standards.
>
> Tamas
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Sorry for not trimming, replying on my phone.
>>
>> --
>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>> View/change your membership options at
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>>
>
>
>
> --
> int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s="int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
> printf(s=%s%s%s, q=%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
> q="\"",s,q,q,a="\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

Respectfully, How does that make sense? Without encryption, I have no
guarantee that someone won't bring down my balloon. And by guarantee,
I mean reasonable guarantee, which encryption provides.

Again sorry for messy reply, sent from phone.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist