how much moving power do you need? Big or small steppers. The smallest, lowest cost I have found are at SPARK FUN.COM A stepper motor and stepper driver sell for about $15 each at that site. use parallel port for control of up to 4 AXES. Check out PROBOTIX or HOBBYCNC for a start. Check out MACH3 or EMC2 for software control. There are a lot of parts ( stepper motors and driver boards) out there for the Hobby CNC market. There are several schematics for home made things also. Bob PICdude wrote: > [ I'm using the PIC tag for this for now, as there is some PIC > content, and we really need to see more of the PIC tag on this forum > lately. ] > > I'm searching for a multi-axis stepper-motor motion controller, but > the options I've found so far are pricey, so that leads to the thought > of rolling my own. Don't really need another project right now, but > I'll make the time for it if it saves me a few hundred $$$. > > My requirements are relatively simple... Interface to a PC (parallel, > RS-232, USB, or I2C) to accept commands to move to a 3-dimensional > vector position (X,Y,Z) with a certain acceleration and max speed > value. The controller will move to that position (coordinated), > accelerating and decelerating accordingly, and sending back some > signal to indicate that it's completed that operation. Future > embellishments may include reading quadrature encoders to verify that > moves are successful. The controller will need to output only step/dir > signals for each axis, which will go to individual drivers. > > So my questions... > (1) Know of any simple 3-axis controllers that will do this at a > relatively decent cost? I'd need it to provide the interface protocol > spec, or a Linux library/API. > > (2) Know of any projects/circuits on the net that does this? > > (3) Know of any controller chips that will make this easy? I found a > similar-ish controller by National semi (LM629), but it was for DC > servo motors. Would be great to find a similar stepper chip. > > (4) As I also consider the home-brew PIC option, I'm wondering which > PIC would be suitable. There would be a good bit of math, and rigid > timing. I've only used PIC 16F's and 18F's to date, but I expect on > of the dsPIC's or 32-bit options would be ideal. > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > > > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist