> You may interpret it that way, but that's only one interpretation, and go=
od
> questions don't need interpreting anyway.

I agree with the intent of that.
The fine detail may vary due to human brains not being identical - but
we essentially agree.

But :-)

> He asked what he asked, and we
> should take it at face value. =A0Wouter's response was right on for that.=
 =A0If
> the OP want's a better answer, he'll have to ask a better question.

Y'All have done a magnificent job, even as you protest, of providing
the sort of valuable material that will be useful in this context. If
you distill the wisdom out of the last few answers you'd get material
which is indeed buried in TMs but available nowhere near as densely.
So - keep up the good work ! :-)

       R

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist