> Joe, do you help *everyone* who asks for help? When I can, yes. Honestly > Considering your credential and the number of people whose > requests you are not responding to, obviously you are "withholding" > help I don't consider I obviously do. I know my strengths, for example my recent posts with h/w and s/w that I've used and know to work and which are relevant to the OP I know little about compilers, languages other than asm, electronic theory, radio etc and replies from others cover those areas well. I would certainly not barge in on those threads and offer "Google for it, you lazy git" and generally try, as most people would tend to do, to not to engage in discussions where I know my ignorance puts me out of my depth > My point is, if you enjoy the process more, you contribute more Well, I do enjoy the list and contribute as much as I can. On the odd occassion, in cahoots with a couple of other larrikins ("some bigger boys made me do it"), I've submitted something which I should have known would have Bob coming at me like a nun with a ruler, and I got a deserved rap on the knuckles I haven't ever had a proper argument or falling out with anyone on the list. Some I know just aren't my cup of tea, just like in life, and I avoid them when possible. Olin isn't included in that list by the way. Personally he's OK > The opposite is also true, my time is worth something to me Well, everybody's time is worth something to them, and this is volunteer work if you want to look at it that way. I'm sure everyone fades in and out of all sorts of things as time permits > and if the list policy makes it more difficult/less enjoyable for me to > offer help, I will withold it in marginal cases where the satisfaction I > get from helping someone is not worth the effort. I don't exactly see what "policy" there is to prevent me offering or asking for help. I've never felt that I'm under any restrictions, apart from inflammatory personal comments like calling someone a liar, or adding fuel to religious, political etc discussions AFAICT there is no "policy" that I can't say simply and only "Have you read the manual ?" or "What have you done to help yourself ?" Do I need to say any more than that initially ? Do I really need to say it in any other way ? "You come in here asking for a favour ...." or "We're not helping you if you don't help yourself" Despite some very tempting moments, I don't believe I've ever been prodded quite enough to indulge in malicious name-calling. Even confronted by the likes of a Jose S Samonte Jr (good grief, the name is etched), who was a test of patience indeed, I still tried my very best to maintain some decorum (publicly anyway). Others at the time were quite openly suggesting that micros were not for him and eventually I think that was proved correct and he wandered off. I don't recall anyone actually calling him an idiot or a moron but the implications were certainly there My approach was, and usually is, to give them the benefit of the doubt and see where it goes. If they argue, continually doubt the content of help, or what they're being told simply won't sink in, then it's time to move on from that person. One example was someone who got up eveyone's noses and I, amongst others, told him offlist that if he does that, people will just clam up. We all got an abusive email from him so we clammed up. In that one case, yes, I/we did withhold help and refused to answer anymore of his questions (which he carried on posting like nothing had happened) and he was/is persona non grata Personally, I really haven't noticed any changes in how the list is run, as it affects me on a day-to-day basis. There were opposing points of view back when James Newton was running it too The current discussion has risen to the surface many times over the years, but the rest of the threads, the vast majority of threads overall, have hardly changed in demeanour What I would like to see are figures showing historically how many people have left **simply because** of the under-discussion issues. If that's even possible One or two have said they refrain from asking questions because they fear the replies they might get. I don't understand that, as they have been on this list long enough to know how to ask a question "properly" -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist