On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, M. Adam Davis <stienman@gmail.com> wrote:
> He had good reasons for choosing this path, and those projects will
> certainly not meet his needs. =A0You might consider re-reading his post
> more carefully.

I admit that I did not read the long email in details. And I have
no interests in Forth anyway. I am just making a suggestion.

I wrote the following.
"> I understand the pride of developing your own compiler
> and probably you can use it for your own purpose. So
> the above is just a suggestion."

I am very sure that he can developed the product if he
spend enough time on it. But then that would only
serve his purpose for a period of time. I dare to say
that in the end very few people will use it, just like the
other Forth implementations for PIC. So I feel that the
time can be well spent elsewhere.

Again, this is just my personal opinion.


-- =

Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist