He had good reasons for choosing this path, and those projects will
certainly not meet his needs.  You might consider re-reading his post
more carefully.

-Adam

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Byron Jeff <byronjeff@clayton.edu> wrote:
>> For the longest I've been trying to put together a development environment
>> that I could feel productive with.
>
> Since you are a firm believer of Open Source, I just has another
> proposal. Why not forget about Forth and put your strength
> behind the two main stream Open Source PIC Compiler
> project -- SDCC and JAL?
>
> There are open source Forth efforts for PIC before, or other
> Open Source compiler for PIC before, none of them are
> widely used as SDCC/JAL.
>
> I understand the pride of developing your own compiler
> and probably you can use it for your own purpose. So
> the above is just a suggestion.
>
> BTW, I found out that gnupic.org is abandoned
> but Webarchive has the original pages.
>
> PIC Compiler Links collection (including quite some Forth
> links)
> http://www.microchip.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=235424
>
>
> --
> Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist