On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 18:55 -0500, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> Much has been said but absolutely nothing was done and no direct questions
> or requests were responded to.  If the answer is "No, you're not going to
> get off moderation ever, get over it", then you should at least say so so
> that I can unsubscribe now and stop wasting time.  This is a community, but
> the admins largely didn't participate in the dicussion.  That's not a good
> way to lead a community.

Wah, wah, wah, if you don't like it, leave.

> Herbert did bring up some logistical points, but never responded to the
> answers.  

I didn't respond because I didn't have time, that a good enough reason?

> This lack of willingness to even discuss list policy is not a good
> policy.

In your opinion. 

In my opinion, there is nothing NEW to discuss, therefore no discussion
is warranted.

You rehash the SAME arguments over and over and over again. Many of us
are sick of it.

I personally just don't care, the list is better with you on moderation,
and unless you commit to changing your behaviour your status as
moderated will not change.

Since I'm just one admin my post should not be taken as gospel, I'm just
explaining why I no longer waste my time with anything related to you.

TTYL

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist