M. Adam Davis wrote: > The fact that you're complaining about it shows that this has some > effect. Yes, it annoys people, degrades conversation flow, and let's individual people with little accountability censor posts in secret. > Since it's long been obvious that no punishment will ever compel you > to change or leave, we're stuck with this horrible, terrible, no good, > very bad compromise called moderation. There are better alternatives. The point of this thread was to discuss them. If you don't care to discuss list policy, that's fine, but there is no call to belittle those that do. >> Not only is censorship just plain wrong > > Oh, are you pretending this is censorship again? Let's see. Someone else decides whether what you write will allowed to be publicly distributed. Don't look now, but that's pretty much the definition of censorship. > Please. Engage me. I was trying to have a reasoned discussion about list policy. It appears you would prefer a mud fight. Drag up anything you want from the archives, I don't care. But please, start your own thread if that's what you want to do. I'd like to keep this one civil and on its original topic. > I've got over a decade of list archives, and I'm > ready and raring to go. I'll dig into history, share your more > interesting contributions with the list, show a pattern of > brow-beating and abuse towards members of the list and especially > administrators. > > Chronicle your entire piclist existence and demonstrate forcefully > that you are not an asset. Methinks you need to get over yourself, but the archives are public record so do what you want. Just please, not in this thread. > I don't contribute much to the piclist, ******************************************************************** Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products (978) 742-9014. Gold level PIC consultants since 2000. -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist