Bob Ammerman wrote:
> > I know, but there is something funny going on.  I looked at it with
> > 'xxd' and you have a CR/^M/0x0D with no LF/0x0A, and I will bet that's
> > confusing the compiler.
> 
> If that's what is confusing the compiler then the compiler is broken. CR and 
> LF are both defined as whitespace characters and any number of consecutive 
> whitespace characters is treated as equivalent to a single space.

Well, yes, but the concept of "newline" is still significant, especially
with //-style comments.

In this case, the compiler is not recognizing a bare CR as a newline, and
therefore, the first line of the function definition is being commented out.

-- Dave Tweed
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist