Em 26/2/2010 06:11, Alan B. Pearce escreveu:
>> The 'for' construct is much more concise, elegant
>> and easier to understand.
>>
> ;))) Not according to Chuck Hellebuyuk that wrote "Beginners Guide to
> Embedded C Programming" (available through Microchip). He also doesn't 
> like
> the ++ and += styles of notation ...
>

Some C compilers for small systems do a better job at:

i = 10;
while ( i != 0)
    --i;

than:

for (i=0; i < 10; ++i)
    ;

or sometimes even:

for (i=10; i !=0;--i)
    ;

-- Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist