>
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Bob Blick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:45:47 -0700, "YES NOPE9" said:
>
>> Lazy ?   Google absolutely has no responsibility to remove any  
>> content
>> regardless of how tacky , inaccurate , pornographic, ???? it is.
>> They may
>> *choose* to do so in order to retain their customers.
>
> Afraid your Google stock is going down?
>
> I can't really fathom why you would take sides against the kid's right
> to privacy.

The kid has a no *right* to privacy as portrayed in this story.  The  
kid can request the video be removed.
One would expect that Google would remove it as a gesture of *good  
will* .
>
> If this makes Google more careful in the future, I say good.
>
> Nobody's even going to jail over this.
>
> If they publicly host it, they need to be prepared to take the heat.
No doubt they will get heat ...... but do they deserve it any more  
than the
kid deserves to be bullied ?
>
> If Google stops hosting videos it wouldn't be any big loss. YouTube is
> 99.9% crap anyway.
>
> But I forget - you are also against moderation on the Piclist...

I wouldn't moderate you .................

> -Bob
>
-- or anyone else really
Gus
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist