>
> On Feb 22, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Vitaliy wrote:
>
>> #4  They could read anything on the PIClist and not get upset.
>> They could choose to ignore anything they considered a
>> waste of time.  They would not have to be protected by
>> "nanny" moderators because ..... see #1
>> They could differentiate between useful information and
>> ad hominems.  They might even exceed fish self-awareness
>> by recognizing the water they swim in.
>
> Unfortunately we are neither angels, nor governed by angels.
>
> Moderation is a necessary evil.

I would like to believe that practicing evil is never a good idea.
Of course, having said that , I fail in my efforts often.
Moderation is a mistake more often than not.
Gus


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist