I prefer to be treated abruptly and succinctly and wish I could
respond to others the same, but I waste considerable time trying to
phrase emails so it does not put the recipient offside.

RTFM means I really should read the manual and from someone like Olin
ET AL (who's advice, time and effort I respect and appreciate) clearly
means I am looking in the wrong place.

This is a technical forum and the more efficiently the info flows the bette=
r.

I think few people like this approach but for me it is a case of
"beggars cant be choosers" and I am begging for free information and
advice and I get it.  I don't need it sugar coated.

I accept there should be limits but I have no idea what they should
be.  As such I am in awe of the job of the admins and moderators do.

So, I thank you all.

Lastly, What is PC as in PC  off the deep end

Cheers Justin




On 21 February 2010 14:54, Apptech <apptechnz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Once we finally got rid of James, ...
>
> 1. We ?
>
> 2. Freudian slip? :-) =A0(I'm sure it wasn't but ... )
>
>
> =A0 =A0R
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist