Wouter van Ooijen ha scritto:
>> sorry :) thought I had been clear: TX <-> RX; keep primary and secondary =

>> at place, and so the polarities.
> =

> I guess that might work, but I can imagine a manufacturer using a =

> physically smaller core for the receiver transformer. I would ask the =

> manufacturer before doing this in quantities.

I see, yeah, makes sense indeed...
I can try asking them: it is a TS6121C, though I am not sure who =

actually is the manufacturer...


> To save space: maybe use a jack with built-in transformers?

More than that, it's a housing/casing issue: we'd need a 90=B0 or rather =

180=B0 connector, and no complete magnetics is available like that; so =

we're designing the PCB with either a RJ connector or a molex strip to =

move some few cm apart to a panel connector.

thank you Wouter



-- =


Ciao, Dario
--
Cyberdyne
-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist